“FG Is Still Owing Me $800m For My Detention In 2015” – Nnamdi Kanu

Atiku Abubakar
“Atiku Cannot Win In His Local Government Talk less Of Winning Presidential Election” – Buhari’s Aide
December 4, 2017
Okorocha
Governor Rochas Okorocha Appoints His Sister As Imo State Commissioner For Happiness
December 6, 2017

The leader of the proscribed Indigenous People of Biafra, Nnamdi Kanu, has said that he is still being owed about $800m which is compensation for his alleged unlawful arrest and detention in 2015.

Kanu said the Federal government is still owing him the entitlement despite the fact that he has been granted bail by the Federal High Court in Abuja where he is being prosecuted alongside others on charges of treasonable felony.

This was contained in his response to the motion filed by the Federal Government asking the Community Court of the Economic Community of West African States sitting in Abuja to dismiss a fundamental human rights enforcement suit filed by the IPOB leader.

Kanu had filed the suit on March 3, 2016 demanding $800m as compensation from the Federal Government for his alleged unlawful arrest in 2015 and detention.

READ: IPOB: “Where Is Nnamdi Kanu, Is He Dead Or Alive?” – UK Asks FG As Army Says He Is Not In Military Custody

But the Federal Government, through its lawyer, Mrs. Maimuna Shiru, filed its motion on November 13, stating that Kanu having been granted bail by the Federal High Court in Abuja on April 25, 2017, and allegedly jumped bail, the judgment of the ECOWAS Court on the suit would serve no purpose.

But Kanu, through his lawyer, Mr. Ifeanyi Ejiofor, objected to the Federal Government’s motion contending that granting bail to the IPOB leader was just a partial satisfaction of prayers sought in the suit.

READ: “Produce Nnamdi Kanu Or Forfeit Your N100m” – Court Tells Senator Abaribe

He maintained that the ECOWAS Court had the power to grant his client the $800m compensation sought since the IPOB leader’s rights had been violated.

Ejiofor stated in his written address, “We submit therefore that the court has powers to order for payment of compensatory damages when found that the plaintiff’s right has been violated.”

Leave a Reply